Top 10 Net Neutrality Reasons Why
Top 10 Net Neutrality advantages for the general public are all centered around the factor that without it the Internet will not longer be a universally accepted standard infrastructure.
- Only way to keep the internet open for small to mid-sized companies.
If net neutrality is not made the basis for connectivity and access, the large companies like Google, Amazon and Twitter will have a complete monopoly in their markets. Also the large carriers like AT&T and Verizon will have no incentive to create better and faster access to the Internet.
- Creates an open playing field.
With net neutrality in place, Internet Service Providers (ISP) have do not control what passes through the devices that are used by customers to access the Internet. This means an ISP under net neutrality cannot block access, change services, or alter the flow of data simply because there is something that goes on which they don’t like.
- Remain as an international channel without governmental interference.
Recently whenever there has been civil unrest, governments have taken over or eliminated access. Without small players in the space, there can be no alternative sources for access. Add to that the recent moves by the Russian government to to close down all connectivity to the general Internet in “troubled political” situations will only be enhanced without net neutrality.
- Fosters innovation.
Innovation is encouraged and protected with the internet remains neutral. Big companies still have the same access as SMBs or freelancers and this allows everyone come with new and creative solutions. Just look at companies that started with a video and audio attached to door bells. Now and entire new segment of the security industry has been created with “self-service” security. No longer do companies like ADT have a monopoly on that sector of the industry.
- Freedom of expression is fostered.
Blogs, services, businesses, and any website that can operate legally is able to do so and be available because of net neutrality. There isn’t any censorship available as long as the content being offered meets legal obligations. If illegal content is discovered, it can be immediately reported to law enforcement officials. Without this freedom of expression, it could become easier for illegal content, such as child pornography, to become more available. If a small ISP blocked access to all and approved of such a thing, it could hamper keeping our communities safe.
- Illegal activities are monitored.
ISPs, are like utilities as they provide everyone with the services they need. For example , illegal file sharing, due to the fact that each ISP is treated as a regulated common carrier.
- Unlimited data is available to everyone equally.
In the 1990s, internet users had a good time being online in AOL chat rooms or waiting 20 minutes for a cool website to load. Today, there are real-time video calls. Companies like Netflix providing legal streaming. YouTube has grown into an educational and entertainment network.
- Income from internet uses has moved to a subscription base.
There are certain businesses and high-use individuals who consume large amounts of bandwidth every month. Entire industries have been created that generate revenue based on service provided not access. It is like the Interstate Highway System, everyone benefits.
- Competition thrives.
There are numerous online streaming services that offer live TV today: Hulu, PlayStation Vue, and Sling by Dish Network are just three examples. If a customer must choose Comcast as their ISP, then these streaming services could be given a lower priority because they are rival organizations. Comcast could choose to offer the highest speeds to the networks and services it owns and slow down the signals provided by the competition. This would effectively limit consumer choice.
- Free internet access is Free.
When the internet becomes a place where profitability is the primary concern, the idea of providing free internet access to those who cannot afford it goes away. Providers could charge whatever they wanted and restrict access to whomever they please. This could lead to demographic discrimination, socioeconomic discrimination, or prioritize content to the wealthiest who are willing to pay high prices for the fastest data streams.
This is an ever evolving area as Net Neutrality is not in the area of political influence. Time will only tell what will happen.